Author Topic: 5 Things We Learned From The Wall Street Journal's Exclusive Report on SpaceX  (Read 520 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Buster's Uncle

  • Geo's kind, I unwind, HE'S the
  • Planetary Overmind
  • *
  • Posts: 51306
  • €302
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • Because there are times when people just need a cute puppy  Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur  A WONDERFUL concept, Unity - & a 1-way trip that cost 400 trillion & 40 yrs.  
  • AC2 is my instrument, my heart, as I play my song.
  • Planet tales writer Smilie Artist Custom Faction Modder Downloads Contributor AC2 Wiki contributor
    • View Profile
    • My Custom Factions
    • Awards
5 Things We Learned From The Wall Street Journal's Exclusive Report on SpaceX
Internal documents show that SpaceX never really intended to earn much profit from rocket launches.
The Motley Fool
Rich Smith  Feb 12, 2017 at 10:13AM



By now you've almost certainly heard the big news about SpaceX: Last month, The Wall Street Journal uncovered a treasure trove of internal documents from the company. These documents clearly demonstrate that SpaceX is neither profitable nor cash flow positive any longer.

It's what you may not have heard, though, that will really shock you: SpaceX never planned to earn much profit from launching rockets in the first place. Instead, SpaceX is placing its faith in a megaproject, partially backed by Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL), to create a satellite broadband internet constellation, which will encircle the globe, and (as the Journal puts it) "eventually dwarf [SpaceX's] rocket division."

Now, here are five more things you need to know about SpaceX's secret plan for satellite dominance.



Look! Up in the sky! It's not a bird or a plane -- it's how SpaceX hopes to turn profitable. Image source: Getty Images.


1. Tiny satellites, huge profits

While most famous today for its rocket launches (and soon to become famous for launching reused rockets, perhaps as soon as this month), SpaceX sees rockets as only a small part of its plans for future profits.

According to internal documents dated from 2015, SpaceX hopes to begin putting a constellation of 4,425 broadband internet satellites into orbit in 2018, and begin collecting revenue from it as an internet service provider as early as 2019.


2. Moving the needle

That year, revenue from satellites will be minuscule -- a few hundred million dollars at most, and probably contributing nothing to profits. Just one year later, however, in 2020, SpaceX expects to get roughly equal amounts of revenue from rocket launches and from satellite internet, about $3 billion each. Profits are expected to leap to $2 billion -- 33% of revenue.

 
3. Blasting off

And this is just the beginning. SpaceX expects its revenue from satellite internet to grow by leaps and bounds from 2020 on, eclipsing revenue from rocket launches in 2021. SpaceX expects that by 2022, satellite revenue will account for roughly 75% of all revenue the company collects, then grow to more than 80% in 2023, and to 85% or more in 2024 and 2025 -- by which time SpaceX expects to be regularly landing astronauts on Mars.


4. Planned obsolescence for rocket launches?

You might expect that once SpaceX has begun its Mars colonization project, the company would lose interest in the workaday business of merely lofting satellites into Earth orbit -- and you'd be right.

SpaceX's rocket launch plans got knocked off track by its twin SpaceXplosions in 2015 and 2016. But before those plans went askew, the company had mapped out a surprising future for its rocket launch program. Starting off from a base of zero launches in 2011, SpaceX planned to steadily increase the pace of launches through 2019. SpaceX had 27 launches slated for this year, for example. That number would grow to 44 launches in 2018, and then 52 in 2019. But in 2020, satellite launch activity would suddenly reverse course, and fall to just 41 launches.

At the same time, SpaceX projects modest increases in launch revenue even after 2020. The logical conclusion is that by 2020, what few rockets SpaceX is still launching will be bigger, and more expensive, and will carry bigger, more expensive satellites, too -- just not as many of them.

 
5. A margin explosion

So what does all of this mean for SpaceX stock, and for the investors who hope to invest in a possible eventual SpaceX IPO?

As we explained last week, SpaceX's internal documents show that even in the best of years, it has been only marginally profitable, and is not profitable at all at present. Introducing reusable rocket launches, as the company plans to do this month, holds the potential to put SpaceX back in the black. But significant profits -- the kind that can finance the colonization of Mars -- will depend on the company's successful deployment and operation of a constellation of broadband internet satellites.

Based on the numbers laid out above, SpaceX appears to be targeting operating profit margins of 33% once its satellites begin operating in 2020. Operating profits could total $4 billion by 2021 (a profit margin of more than 40% on projected revenue of about $9.5 billion). Margins will top 50% by 2022 -- then soar into the mid-50s range in 2023, and finally top out at better than 60% by 2025. At that point, SpaceX expects to be collecting $36 billion in annual revenue -- almost all of it from satellites -- and earning roughly $22 billion in operating profit. To put that final goal in context, $22 billion in profit is 11 times more than the $1 billion in revenue that SpaceX collected in 2014, its best revenue year ever.

Logical conclusion: If SpaceX can bring its broadband satellite internet project to fruition, SpaceX stock could turn out to be a very profitable investment. But if you're planning to invest in SpaceX, you need to do it for the satellite business (which doesn't exist yet), and not for the rocket launch business that does exist.


https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/02/12/5-things-we-learned-wall-street-journal-spacex.aspx?source=yahoo-2&utm_campaign=article&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=yahoo-2&yptr=yahoo

Offline Unorthodox

  • The luckiest man alive and
  • The Thing in the Shadows
  • *
  • Posts: 9768
  • €2693
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  
  • Halloween wierdo
  • AC2 Hall Of Fame
    • View Profile
    • An Unorthodox Halloween
    • Awards
I highly doubt reusable rockets will be quite as cost efficient as advertised either. 

Offline Buster's Uncle

  • Geo's kind, I unwind, HE'S the
  • Planetary Overmind
  • *
  • Posts: 51306
  • €302
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • Because there are times when people just need a cute puppy  Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur  A WONDERFUL concept, Unity - & a 1-way trip that cost 400 trillion & 40 yrs.  
  • AC2 is my instrument, my heart, as I play my song.
  • Planet tales writer Smilie Artist Custom Faction Modder Downloads Contributor AC2 Wiki contributor
    • View Profile
    • My Custom Factions
    • Awards
They never are.

Offline Geo

So, not only are we bombarded from space by pieces, but soon also regularly by bits and bytes?

Offline Unorthodox

  • The luckiest man alive and
  • The Thing in the Shadows
  • *
  • Posts: 9768
  • €2693
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  
  • Halloween wierdo
  • AC2 Hall Of Fame
    • View Profile
    • An Unorthodox Halloween
    • Awards
The orbital wifi system/ global connectivity/ whatever they are calling it has been a pipe dream for at least 5 years now.  I've heard it with satelites, balloons, little drones, just about anything you can think of providing the actual data stream.  It would be a HELL of a constellation needed in LEO to provide coverage.  Many more than our TV or GPS constellations (which sit at a much higher orbit as well), and AFAIK, the tech to constantly switch between satellites to maintain connectivity at the user end isn't exactly there yet either. 

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?


Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
24 (7%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
9 (2%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
106 (33%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
40 (12%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
14 (4%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
89 (28%)
AC for Mac
-=-
3 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
5 (1%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
10 (3%)
No patch
-=-
16 (5%)
Total Members Voted: 316
AC2 Wiki Logo
-click pic for wik-

* Random quote

If I determine the enemy's disposition of forces while I have no perceptible form, I can concentrate my forces while the enemy is fragmented. The pinnacle of military deployment approaches the formless: if it is formless, then even the deepest spy cannot discern it nor the wise make plans against it.
~Sun Tzu 'The Art of War'

* Select your theme

*
Templates: 5: index (default), PortaMx/Mainindex (default), PortaMx/Frames (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portamx_above, main, portamx_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 4: index+Modifications.english (default), TopicRating/.english (default), PortaMx/PortaMx.english (default), OharaYTEmbed.english (default).
Style sheets: 0: .
Files included: 45 - 1228KB. (show)
Queries used: 34.

[Show Queries]