NASA calls on SpaceX to send astronauts to ISS

[Buster's Uncle]

NASA calls on SpaceX to send astronauts to ISS
AFP  November 20, 2015 6:04 PM



This June 28, 2015 grab from NASA TV shows the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket with the unmanned Dragon cargo capsule on board shortly after launching from Cape Canaveral, Florida (AFP Photo/)



Miami (AFP) - SpaceX received orders Friday from the US space agency to send astronauts to the International Space Station in the coming years, helping restore US access to space, NASA said.

The announcement was a formal step in a process that began earlier this year when Boeing was given the nod by NASA to send crew to the orbiting outpost by late 2017.

Both Boeing and SpaceX have received billions in seed money from NASA to restore American access to the ISS, after the US space shuttle program was retired in 2011.

The announcement of $4.2 billion for Boeing and $2.6 billion for SpaceX was made in September 2014.

Boeing announced in January that it would be the first, sending a piloted mission aboard its CST-100 Starliner capsule by late 2017.

However, in Friday's announcement, NASA said that "determination of which company will fly its mission to the station first will be made at a later time."

SpaceX is already flying cargo missions to the ISS, and is working on a crew version of its Dragon capsule to carry astronauts.

The announcement marked the "second in a series of four guaranteed orders NASA will make under the Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contracts," the US space agency said.

"The Boeing Company of Houston received its first crew mission order in May."

Kathy Lueders, manager of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, said "it is important to have at least two healthy and robust capabilities from US companies to deliver crew and critical scientific experiments from American soil to the space station throughout its lifespan."

The ISS is expected to remain operational until 2024.

Since the shuttle program ended in 2011, the world's astronauts have relied on Russia's Soyuz capsules for transport at a pice of some $70 million per seat.

"The authority to proceed with Dragon's first operational crew mission is a significant milestone in the Commercial Crew Program and a great source of pride for the entire SpaceX team," said Gwynne Shotwell, president and chief operating office of SpaceX.

"When Crew Dragon takes NASA astronauts to the space station in 2017, they will be riding in one of the safest, most reliable spacecraft ever flown. We're honored to be developing this capability for NASA and our country."


http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-calls-spacex-send-astronauts-iss-230430143.html

[Unorthodox]

"When Crew Dragon takes NASA astronauts to the space station in 2017, they will be riding in one of the safest, most reliable spacecraft ever flown. We're honored to be developing this capability for NASA and our country."


Bold coming off a complete loss and several partial failures...

[Buster's Uncle]

Aren't all the failures related to problems with the booster re-landing development?

[Unorthodox]

The total failure officially was second stage, iirc, so nothing to do with the re-landing.  Partial failures have been single engines failing during launch, and the "just burn the others longer" contingency has resulted in some failed tagalong missions. 

No, I'm not counting the failed landings as failures at all if that's what you mean. 

From here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches

Launch 4 failed to deliver the secondary load due to engine problem on the first stage.

Launch 7 had another engine fire on the first stage. 

Launch 8 the USAF had issues with the separation data, despite the mission being "successful". 

(Both 7 and 8 were certification launches, which is why some of the certifications have taken SpaceX longer)

Launch 17, of course, blew up.  Issue was on second stage, possibly with the separation the USAF noted earlier, I don't know enough about their system to say where the helium tanks get involved on the Falcon 9. 

(though to their credit the Dragon Capsule actually survived that explosion on Launch 17, they just didn't have emergency chute deployment software written for it, so it slammed into the ocean)

4 problems out of 17 flights puts it JUST BARELY over the 75% rate of a Soyez capsule.  (But no, those Russian engines are sooooo unreliable, Space X has pushed congress to ban/limit them, blocking many competitors... )

Meanwhile, Sealaunch has 4 problems in 36 launches:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Launch

And the Delta 4 has 3 problems in 30 (I don't think any are on the configuration that's comparable to a Falcon 9):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_IV