Author Topic: Cosmic Case of Missing Stars Baffles Scientists  (Read 261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gwillybj

Cosmic Case of Missing Stars Baffles Scientists
« on: November 25, 2014, 12:55:03 pm »
space.com
Cosmic Case of Missing Stars Baffles Scientists
by Calla Cofield, Space.com Staff Writer
November 24, 2014 07:01am ET

[video at site]

A massive population of stars is missing, and scientists are stumped as to where it could be.

New observations from the Hubble Space Telescope challenge a previous theory for the apparent disappearance of a massive number of stars. Because some star clusters around our Milky Way galaxy have fewer stars than observations suggest they should, astronomers suspected many of these stars were ejected from their clusters to ultimately find new homes in the Milky Way. But the new Hubble telescope views of the distant Fornax galaxy cluster challenge this picture. That's because, in the case of Fornax, such ejected stars would have nowhere to hide.

"If these kicked-out stars were there, we would see them — but we don't!" Frank Grundahl of Aarhus University in Denmark, a co-author on the paper, said in a statement. The finding draws into question whether the missing stars were ever present at all, in globular clusters around Fornax or the Milky Way.


A Hubble image shows the globular cluster Fornax 3 in the dwarf galaxy Fornax. Astronomers are mystified by stars that seem to be missing from the cluster. Credit: NASA, ESA, S. Larsen (Radboud University, the Netherlands)

Globular clusters are dense balls of stars that usually orbit galaxy centers but lie far away from those centers. They are ancient denizens of the universe, containing some of the oldest living stars.

Astronomers once thought the stars in each of these clusters must have all formed together, at about the same time. But observations of globular clusters near the Milky Way revealed that roughly half the stars are old, while the other half are much younger.

These younger, second-generation stars are polluted with levels of nitrogen and other materials not seen in the first-generation stars, observations showed. This necessitated changes to the formation story of the clusters: Astronomers say it indicates that the young stars formed from material ejected by the older stars, meaning there should be significantly more old stars than young.

But this doesn't fit with the observations that the globular clusters have roughly a 50/50 split of old stars and young.

This missing population of first-generation stars isn’t entirely unexplainable near the Milky Way, which itself has a high population of old stars. The stars from the clusters could have been ejected and simply taken up residence on the outskirts galaxy, blending in nicely with the population, as scientists have hypothesized.

But this can't explain new observations of the Fornax globular clusters, which do not exist near a galaxy with a high population of old stars.


This NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image shows four globular clusters in the dwarf galaxy Fornax. A huge population of stars appears to be missing from globular clusters in the area, scientists say. Credit: NASA, ESA, S. Larsen (Radboud University, the Netherlands)

The Fornax clusters 1, 2, 3 and 5 orbit the Fornax dwarf galaxy, located roughly 62 million light-years from Earth. The ratio of young stars to old is roughly the same in these clusters as it is in the clusters near the Milky Way (other star clusters have different mixtures of star ages). This led astronomers to believe the Fornax clusters formed in the same way: The younger stars were born of material from the older stars, and many of the older stars were then ejected.

But if the stars were ejected, where did they go? Unlike the Milky Way, the galaxy these clusters orbit does not contain enough old stars to account for the huge number that must have been ejected from the clusters. In other words, there's nowhere for the stars to hide.

The findings are leading astronomers to question their theories about globular clusters near the Milky Way. What if the missing stars aren't hiding in the galaxy? What if the "missing" stars never existed? And if that's the case, how did the second-generation of stars form?

"Our leading formation theory just can't be right," said Grundahl. "There's nowhere that Fornax could have hidden these ejected stars, so it appears that the clusters couldn't have been so much larger in the past."

It appears that scientists will have to go back to the drawing board and rethink how these types of globular clusters form.

The new work is detailed in a paper published Nov. 20 in The Astrophysical Journal. (http://www.spacetelescope.org/static/archives/releases/science_papers/heic1425a.pdf)

http://www.space.com/27844-missing-stars-globular-clusters-defy-theories.html
Two possibilities exist: Either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying. ― Arthur C. Clarke
I am on a mission to see how much coffee it takes to actually achieve time travel. :wave:

Offline Geo

Re: Cosmic Case of Missing Stars Baffles Scientists
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2014, 08:17:59 pm »
"Something's eerily wrong outthere!"

Offline gwillybj

Re: Cosmic Case of Missing Stars Baffles Scientists
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2014, 02:32:27 am »
Maybe the "missing stars" cooled - a lot, for sure - and became those "starless planets"? :shrug:

My astrophysics education ended on page one, but I keep trying. I picked up a copy of Max Born's "The Restless Universe" (Dover, 1951). Maybe I can learn some of the basics in there.
Two possibilities exist: Either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying. ― Arthur C. Clarke
I am on a mission to see how much coffee it takes to actually achieve time travel. :wave:

Offline Geo

Re: Cosmic Case of Missing Stars Baffles Scientists
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2014, 08:30:47 am »
Usually, the 'visible' stars in such clusters at such remote distances are the red giants and young, heavy mass stars (O-B spectral class stars).

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?


Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
24 (7%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
9 (2%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
106 (33%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
40 (12%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
14 (4%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
89 (28%)
AC for Mac
-=-
3 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
5 (1%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
10 (3%)
No patch
-=-
16 (5%)
Total Members Voted: 316
AC2 Wiki Logo
-click pic for wik-

* Random quote

The fungus has been Planet's dominant lifeform since about the time of the Lower Paleozoic on Earth. But when, once every hundred million years or so, the neural net at last achieves the critical mass necessary to become sentient, the final metamorphosis kills of most of the other life on the planet. It is possible that we humans can help to break this tragic cycle.
~Lady Deirdre Skye 'Planet Dreams'

* Select your theme

*
Templates: 5: index (default), PortaMx/Mainindex (default), PortaMx/Frames (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portamx_above, main, portamx_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 4: index+Modifications.english (default), TopicRating/.english (default), PortaMx/PortaMx.english (default), OharaYTEmbed.english (default).
Style sheets: 0: .
Files included: 45 - 1228KB. (show)
Queries used: 36.

[Show Queries]