Author Topic: The Future Looks Bleak for Bones  (Read 216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Buster's Uncle

  • Geo's kind, I unwind, HE'S the
  • Planetary Overmind
  • *
  • Posts: 51029
  • €975
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • Because there are times when people just need a cute puppy  Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur  A WONDERFUL concept, Unity - & a 1-way trip that cost 400 trillion & 40 yrs.  
  • AC2 is my instrument, my heart, as I play my song.
  • Planet tales writer Smilie Artist Custom Faction Modder AC2 Wiki contributor Downloads Contributor
    • View Profile
    • My Custom Factions
    • Awards
The Future Looks Bleak for Bones
« on: December 24, 2014, 09:30:56 pm »
The Future Looks Bleak for Bones
The Atlantic
By Nicholas St. Fleur  December 23, 2014 11:00 AM



Somewhere in a dense forest of ash and elm trees, a hunter readies his spear for the kill. He hurls his stone-tipped weapon at his prey, an unsuspecting white-tailed deer he has tracked since morning. The crude projectile pierces the animal’s hide, killing it and giving the hunter food to bring back to his family many miles away. Such was survival circa 5,000 B.C. in ancient North America.

"We can be as strong as an orangutan—we're just not, because we are not challenging our bones."

But today, the average person barely has to lift a finger, let alone throw a spear to quell their appetite. The next meal is a mere online order away. And according to anthropologists, this convenient, sedentary way of life is making bones weak. Ahead, there's a future of fractures, breaks, and osteoporosis. But for some anthropologists, the key to preventing aches in bones is by better understanding the skeletons of our hunter-gatherer ancestors.

“Over the vast majority of human prehistory, our ancestors engaged in far more activity over longer distances than we do today,” said Brian Richmond, an anthropologist from the American Museum of Natural History in New York, in a statement. “We cannot fully understand human health today without knowing how our bodies evolved to work in the past, so it is important to understand how our skeletons evolved within the context of those high levels of activity.”

For thousands of years, Native American hunter-gatherers trekked on strenuous ventures for food. And for those same thousands of years, dense skeletons supported their movements. But about 6,000 years later with the advent of agriculture the bones and joints of Native Americans became less rigid and more fragile. Similar transitions occurred across the world as populations shifted from foraging to farming, according to two new papers published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences.



Modern humans (right) have unusually low density in bones throughout the skeleton, compared with modern chimpanzee, and ancient ancestors, Australopithecus and the Neanderthal (AMNH).


“What our studies show is that modern people today have much less bone density than we should,” said Richmond, one of the studies' co-authors. His team studies spongy bone, a type of bone found at the joints. One day in 2010 when he and his colleague Habiba Chirchir were comparing the bone structure of a human’s middle finger with that of a chimpanzee, they noticed that the human’s was much more porous than the primate’s. His team made a similar finding when they compared foot bones between the two, which Richmond found surprising. He expected humans to have denser foot bones because they bear all of their weight on them.



Comparison between bone mass in a hunter-gatherer and an agriculturalist hip joint. (Timothy Ryan and Colin Shaw)


“So now we asked, do modern human skeletons have unusually low density in our joints? And if so, why?” said Richmond. The team set out to find if there was a recent evolutionary change in skeletal strength. They compared the density in modern human joints from industrial time and early farming era, with that of primates and ancient human hunter-gatherers. For their analysis they performed high-resolution imaging of joints in eight different locations: the humerus, ulna, radius, the metacarpal, femur, the metatarsal and two places in the tibia. They found that modern human joints only have three-fourths to one-third the bone density that modern chimpanzees and orangutans (and ancient humans) have.

While Richmond was conducting a broad analysis of bone density, two anthropologists, Colin Shaw from the University of Cambridge in the U.K. and Timothy Ryan from Penn State, did a narrow study looking at hip joints in foragers from 7,000 years ago and farmers 700 years ago. Using a high-resolution CT scanner, the team found that the foragers had 20 percent more bone mass than the farmers—the equivalent to how much an astronaut loses after spending three months weightless in space. But both groups’ bones were far less dense than those of humans from 150,000 years ago, just like in Richmond's study.

“The fact is, we're human, we can be as strong as an orangutan—we're just not, because we are not challenging our bones with enough loading, predisposing us to have weaker bones so that, as we age, situations arise where bones are breaking when, previously, they would not have” Shaw said in a statement.

Both teams conclude that as humans quit venturing through thick forests and vast plains after herds of deer and buffalo, and instead remained sedentary to farm their food, they exposed their skeletons to less stress. Such changes in activity, rather than diet, might have made us more prone to osteoporosis and breaking bones, the teams said. Their next steps are to analyze the bones of modern marathon runners and athletes to observe how their rigorous exercising affects their bone density. The researchers also warn that with the deskbound lives that many people lead today, our bones may have become even more brittle than ever before.


This article was originally published at http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/12/why-the-future-looks-bleak-for-bones/383996/

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?


Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
24 (7%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
9 (2%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
105 (33%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
40 (12%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
14 (4%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
89 (28%)
AC for Mac
-=-
3 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
5 (1%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
10 (3%)
No patch
-=-
16 (5%)
Total Members Voted: 315
AC2 Wiki Logo
-click pic for wik-

* Random quote

We are no longer particularly in the business of writing software to perform specific tasks. We now teach the software how to learn, and in the primary bonding process it molds itself around the task to be performed. The feedback loop never really ends, so a tenth year polysentience can be a priceless jewel or a psychotic wreck, but it is the primary bonding process?the childhood, if you will?that has the most far-reaching repercussions.
~Bad'l Ron, Wakener, Morgan Polysoft

* Select your theme

*
Templates: 5: index (default), PortaMx/Mainindex (default), PortaMx/Frames (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portamx_above, main, portamx_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 4: index+Modifications.english (default), TopicRating/.english (default), PortaMx/PortaMx.english (default), OharaYTEmbed.english (default).
Style sheets: 0: .
Files included: 47 - 1280KB. (show)
Queries used: 41.

[Show Queries]