Quantum Mystery of Light Revealed by New Experiment

[Buster's Uncle]

Quantum Mystery of Light Revealed by New Experiment
By Clara Moskowitz, LiveScience Senior Writer | LiveScience.com – 3 hrs ago.. .

 
Is light made of waves, or particles?
 
This fundamental question has dogged scientists for decades, because light seems to be both. However, until now, experiments have revealed light to act either like a particle, or a wave, but never the two at once.
 
Now, for the first time, a new type of experiment has shown light behaving like both a particle and a wave simultaneously, providing a new dimension to the quandary that could help reveal the true nature of light, and of the whole quantum world.
 
The debate goes back at least as far as Isaac Newton, who advocated that light was made of particles, and James Clerk Maxwell, whose successful theory of electromagnetism, unifying the forces of electricity and magnetism into one, relied on a model of light as a wave. Then in 1905, Albert Einstein explained a phenomenon called the photoelectric effect using the idea that light was made of particles called photons (this discovery won him the Nobel Prize in physics). [What's That? Your Physics Questions Answered]
 
Ultimately, there's good reason to think that light is both a particle and a wave. In fact, the same seems to be true of all subatomic particles, including electrons and quarks and even the recently discovered Higgs boson-like particle. The idea is called wave-particle duality, and is a fundamental tenet of the theory of quantum mechanics.
 
Depending on which type of experiment is used, light, or any other type of particle, will behave like a particle or like a wave. So far, both aspects of light's nature haven't been observed at the same time.
 
But still, scientists have wondered, does light switch from being a particle to being a wave depending on the circumstance? Or is light always both a particle and a wave simultaneously?

 Now, for the first time, researchers have devised a new type of measurement apparatus that can detect both particle and wave-like behavior at the same time. The device relies on a strange quantum effect called quantum nonlocality, a counter-intuitive notion that boils down to the idea that the same particle can exist in two locations at once.
 
"The measurement apparatus detected strong nonlocality, which certified that the photon behaved simultaneously as a wave and a particle in our experiment," physicist Alberto Peruzzo of England's University of Bristol said in a statement. "This represents a strong refutation of models in which the photon is either a wave or a particle."
 
Peruzzo is lead author of a paper describing the experiment published in the Nov. 2 issue of the journal Science.
 
The experiment further relies on another weird aspect of quantum mechanics — the idea of quantum entanglement. Two particles can become entangled so that actions performed on one particle affect the other. In this way, the researchers were able to allow the photons in the experiment to delay the choice of whether to be particles or waves.
 
MIT physicist Seth Lloyd, who was not involved in the project, called the experiment "audacious" in a related essay in Science, and said that while it allowed the photons to delay the choice of being particles or waves for only a few nanoseconds, "if one has access to quantum memory in which to store the entanglement, the decision could be put off until tomorrow (or for as long as the memory works reliably). So why decide now? Just let those quanta slide!"

http://news.yahoo.com/quantum-mystery-light-revealed-experiment-132150087.html

Folks, this is HUGE.  It's progress on a basic quandry of quantum physics that's had everyone stumped much longer than I've been alive.

A thing I've been wondering about for a while:  why I have I never seen anything about anyone looking into a possible connection between the missing/tiny spatial dimensions implied in the String Theory math and all the anomolies of quantum physics?  My layman-and-completely-non-mathematical guess is that quantum entanglement is bull; maybe it's the same particle existing in nine dimensional space perceived on the spatial level we're aware of as widely-separated 3D cross sections.  Hmm? 

That one's maybe a reach, 'cause the missing dimentions ought to be tiny if they exist, but I imagine most of the other quantum effects could be easily explained if we could wrap our heads around the implication of all those extra spatial dimensions.