How Do Black Holes Form? This New Study Offers An Answer

[Buster's Uncle]

How Do Black Holes Form? This New Study Offers An Answer
Nicolae Bochis
BGR
Sun, September 21, 2025 at 10:17 AM EDT
4 min read



Supermassive black hole surrounded by accretion disk - El.artico/Shutterstock


At the heart of nearly every galaxy lurks a cosmic giant: a supermassive black hole. These mysterious objects, millions to billions of times more massive than our Sun, exert such powerful gravity that not even light can escape them. These black holes are so massive that they shape the galaxies around them. They influence star formation, galactic evolution, and even the movement of entire clusters. Our own Milky Way is no exception. In its center lies Sagittarius A*, a supermassive black hole with four million solar masses. Even though these black holes are critical for the existence of galaxies, we still don't know with complete certainty how these cosmic giants form.

However, a new study on the Pop III.1 model, led by theoretical astrophysicist Jonathan Tan of the University of Virginia, takes on this challenge with a fresh perspective. Tan, a respected professor renowned for his work in star and planet formation, draws upon decades of research to lay the groundwork for a novel theory that could explain how these giant cosmic objects were formed. According to the study, the collapse of the first-generation stars, also known as primordial stars, could have resulted in the formation of supermassive black holes.


The Pop III.1 model


Super giant star with stars in the background - Nazarii Neshcherenskyi/Getty Images


In the earliest epoch of the universe, long before galaxies and planets existed, the first generation of stars was born. These stars emerged from primordial hydrogen and helium, and are named the Population III stars by astrophysicists. The Pop III.1 model, developed by Jonathan Tan, describes stars that formed in an environment untouched by heavier elements. Without carbon, oxygen, or heavy metals to regulate cooling, these first stars were able to reach extraordinarily high masses. Imagine stars that are hundreds of times more massive than our sun. The immense size of these primordial stars led to their short lifespans, and their rapid collapse formed the first black holes. These early black holes, the remnants of the Pop III stars, acted as seeds from which the first massive black holes grew. Eventually, they grew big enough to become supermassive black holes that we now observe at the centers of galaxies. Scientists have even discovered an ultramassive black hole that's close to 36 billion times heavier than our Sun.

Population III.1 stars played another critical role in shaping the early universe. Their intense radiation ionized the surrounding hydrogen gas, initiating the process of cosmic reionization. This was the pivotal phase in which our universe changed its structure and energy balance. The result of rapid reionization was a sudden illumination of the cosmos known as "the Flash" in the world of astronomy. The dual influence of the Pop III.1 stars on the universe makes them central to understanding the dawn of cosmic structure.


The challenges and alternatives


Massive black hole at the center of a galaxy - Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock


Besides explaining the birth of supermassive black holes, the Pop III.1 theory also touches on some of the major unresolved tensions in cosmology. These include the "Hubble tension," the debate over dynamic dark energy, and even anomalies connected to neutrino masses. By tying the earliest stars and their black hole remnants to the large-scale evolution of the universe, Tan's model offers a unique view that could bring these puzzles into sharper focus.

Still, the Pop III.1 scenario isn't the only idea on the table. Some competing theories argue that primordial black holes formed directly from density fluctuations in the first seconds after the Big Bang. And these black holes may have been the seeds for supermassive black holes. Another line of thought points to the direct collapse of massive gas clouds that didn't form into stars. Each approach explains the same cosmic mystery with very different mechanisms.

The Pop III.1 model's predictions about early-universe ionization also face challenges. Observational limits from the cosmic microwave background, especially constraints related to the kinematic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, suggest that the amount and timing of reionization may be difficult to reconcile. Nevertheless, the Pop III.1 model remains a very compelling theory, and it continues to drive debate about how one of the universe's first structures came to be.

Read the original article on BGR.