Author Topic: SpaceX may be about to drastically cut the cost of launching stuff into orbit  (Read 268 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Buster's Uncle

  • Geo's kind, I unwind, HE'S the
  • Planetary Overmind
  • *
  • Posts: 51323
  • €606
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • Because there are times when people just need a cute puppy  Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur  A WONDERFUL concept, Unity - & a 1-way trip that cost 400 trillion & 40 yrs.  
  • AC2 is my instrument, my heart, as I play my song.
  • Planet tales writer Smilie Artist Custom Faction Modder Downloads Contributor AC2 Wiki contributor
    • View Profile
    • My Custom Factions
    • Awards
SpaceX may be about to drastically cut the cost of launching stuff into orbit
Business Insider
Dave Mosher  March 21, 2017



(SpaceX's first-stage booster of a Falcon 9 rocket landing on a drone ship in the ocean.SpaceX/Flickr (public domain))



SpaceX, the rocket company founded by tech mogul Elon Musk, is poised to make good on its promise to slash the cost of launching things into space.

In December 2015, SpaceX did something no commercial aerospace company had done before: It launched a satellite into orbit aboard a Falcon 9 rocket, then safely landed the rocket's lower half, called a first-stage booster, on a launchpad.

Musk was ecstatic, and for good reason. Orbital rockets cost tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of dollars to build, but they're never recycled; they typically smash into the ocean and sink to the bottom.

While SpaceX has filled a large hangar with used rocket boosters over the past year, it has yet to show the boosters can be re-launched.

But the feat now seems imminent.

As we first learned from a post by Eric Berger at Ars Technica, SpaceX could pull off its first-ever launch of a used booster as early as March 29. The rocket part will help ferry a new communications satellite into orbit — then go for a second touchdown.

"Will attempt a droneship landing [of the booster], too," John Taylor, SpaceX's director of communication, wrote in an email to Business Insider.



(A hangar filling up with used Falcon 9 first-stage rocket boosters near launchpad 39A at Cape Canaveral, Florida.SpaceX/Flickr (public domain))


A satellite company called SES signed a contract for this launch in August 2016. However, SpaceX delayed that mission due to a launchpad explosion on September 1, 2016.

No one was hurt during the incident, which Musk said was "the most difficult and complex failure we have ever had". It took the company months to figure out what happened and allegedly fix the issue.

If the upcoming mission, called SES-10, goes as planned, it could mark the beginning of an era where SpaceX can reliably offer the lowest cost per pound to get stuff to and from low-Earth orbit and beyond.


How deep will the discount be?


spacex crs8 launch  (SpaceX/Flickr)


Each Falcon 9 rocket launch costs a customer about $62 million. SpaceX spends nearly $37 million to build, fuel, and launch each rocket, for roughly a 40% margin, according to a Space News analysis.

In 2016, Gwynne Shotwell, the president and COO of SpaceX, said customers who launch on a used booster could get 30% off their launch bill.



spacex falcon heavy lift rocket illustration  (SpaceX)


That means SpaceX customers save about $18.6 million per launch (and SpaceX likely more) when a recycled Falcon 9 rocket booster is used instead of a new one.

Those savings could further compound as SpaceX prepares to debut its gigantic Falcon Heavy rocket system, which will use three boosters — all of which can self-land, be fueled up, and launch again.

Each launch of a Falcon Heavy is projected to cost about $90 million, and should be powerful enough to send a crewed mission to the moon.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/spacex-may-dramatically-cut-cost-164900224.html

Offline Geo

No info on how much it costs to refurbish such a first stage recovered rocket?

Offline Unorthodox

  • The luckiest man alive and
  • The Thing in the Shadows
  • *
  • Posts: 9768
  • €2693
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  You can never leave the Things in the Shadows behind...  
  • Halloween wierdo
  • AC2 Hall Of Fame
    • View Profile
    • An Unorthodox Halloween
    • Awards
Of course not.  It hasn't been done yet.  But it's going to be more than just fuel cost. 

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?


Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
24 (7%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
9 (2%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
106 (33%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
40 (12%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
14 (4%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
89 (28%)
AC for Mac
-=-
3 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
5 (1%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
10 (3%)
No patch
-=-
16 (5%)
Total Members Voted: 316
AC2 Wiki Logo
-click pic for wik-

* Random quote

Let the Gaians preach their silly religion, but one way or the other I shall see this compound burned, seared, and sterilized until every hiding place is found and until every last Mind Worm egg, every last slimy one, has been cooked to a smoking husk. That species shall be exterminated, I tell you! Exterminated!”
~Academician Prokhor Zakharov Lab Three aftermath

* Select your theme

*
Templates: 5: index (default), PortaMx/Mainindex (default), PortaMx/Frames (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portamx_above, main, portamx_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 4: index+Modifications.english (default), TopicRating/.english (default), PortaMx/PortaMx.english (default), OharaYTEmbed.english (default).
Style sheets: 0: .
Files included: 45 - 1228KB. (show)
Queries used: 38.

[Show Queries]